Category Archives: Vaccines

4,250% Increase In Fetal Loss Reports During H1N1 Vaccine “Pandemic” Season: The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Does Nothing!

h1n1 vax obama

4,250% Increase In Fetal Loss Reports During H1N1 Vaccine “Pandemic” Season: The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Does Nothing!

Curt Linderman Sr. & Eileen Danahmann
A new study published in the Human and Experimental Toxicology Journal September 27, 2012 authored by Gary Goldman PhD  (1) documents that the CDC double-dosed pregnant women with the untested H1N1 flu vaccine and the seasonal flu vaccine, both containing te neurotoxin mercury, causing a 4,250% increase in fetal deaths.  The study suggests that the CDC had full knowledge, in real time, as it was occurring, of a massive spike in spontaneous abortions and stillbirths during the 2009/2010 flu season (commonly known as the 2009 Pandemic flu season), but failed to inform the nation’s OB/GYNs nor the vulnerable public so as to avoid further fetal losses.

Purposely suppressing the VAERS data which validates a 2009 genocide of unborn children and for the purpose of ensuring the continuance of the vaccine program for pregnant women, the CDC installed a study in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG), authored by CDC’s Dr. Pedro Moro in October 2010 (the start of the next flu season after the pandemic season) (2).
Moro’s study boldly announced that in 19 influenza seasons (1990/1991 – 2008/ 2009) there were a total of only 23 Vaccine Event Reporting System (VAERS) fetal loss reports (17 spontaneous abortions and 6 stillbirths) related to the influenza vaccine. That averages a mere 1.2 fetal loss reports per year during a 19-year period. Giving the impression that the flu shot was safe for pregnant women, the study formed the basis of a worldwide publicity campaign “The Flu Shot Is Safe for Pregnant Women”. It is important to notice that Moro did not include the critical 2009 pandemic flu season in his study despite the fact that the VAERS reports for the July 1 2009-June 30, 2010 Pandemic flu season, was fully available to him well before the publication of his study in Oct. 2010. Why didn’t Moro include the VAERS 2009/10 flu season data, which documents (as acknowledged in Moro’s subsequent study 8 months later) a spike of 140 fetal loss reports in just the first five (5) months of the 2009/10 flu season as compared to 1.2 fetal deaths per year in the previous 19 years? Moro conveniently left out of the study the available 2009 Pandemic data containing an astronomical increase associated with the double-dosing protocol recommended by the CDC.

One can only conclude that the well timed AJOG study was orchestrated to deceive the public, the physicians and the media into thinking that the flu shot was safe for pregnant women and to form the basis for the CDC worldwide publicity campaign. Even though in the body of his study Moro cited the data range as 1990/91-2008/9, Moro strategically titled his study “Adverse events in pregnant women following administration of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and live attenuated influenza vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1990-2009”, which would give the impression at a cursory glace that the 2009 Pandemic season was included in the study.

Wouldn’t the physicians and pregnant women have wanted to know that VAERS is reporting an enormous rise in miscarriages associated with the untested H1N1 vaccine? Should the CDC have notified the physicians and the public – in real time – of the adverse events connected with the untested flu vaccine so as to avoid further deaths.

 

Due to the independent tracking and collection of the VAERS data by the National Coalition of Organized Women and its early confrontation with the government agencies in both Washington, DC and Atlanta, Georgia exposing the CDC’s willful misconduct in denying the increase in fetal loss reports, a “CDC damage control” study was published 8 months later (too late to save the babies that were injected in-utero) by Moro et al (3) a strategic, belated acknowledgment that there was a massive spike in fetal loss reports in the 2009 Pandemic season – an incomplete total of 140 VAERS fetal loss reports (121 spontaneous abortions and 19 Stillbirths) during the first five (5) months of the 2009/2010 flu vaccine season where both vaccines  (not one, but two vaccines with mercury) were aggressively pushed on pregnant women.

 

This massive spike in spontaneous abortions and stillbirths should have sounded alarm bells all over the health care industry.  However, Moro and his team fraudulently concluded that this ‘anomaly” of a massive increase was simply due to the “Weber Effect” whereby adverse reaction to new drugs tend to be reported more frequently during the first two years of coming onto the market until physicians and consumers get tired of reporting the adverse effects. Can you imagine a mother or a physician forgoing the responsibility of reporting the death of their baby because the vaccine has already been around for a few years?  Doesn’t make sense! It didn’t make sense to Dr. Gary Goldman either.

 

The recent Goldman study, “Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons. Was there a synergistic fetal toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season” (1) documents the complete VAERS reports of 178 fetal losses in 2009/10 (in contrast to Moro’s count of 140 for a five month period).  The corrected data reflects a 4,250% increase in VAERS fetal loss reports in 2009/10 compared to 4 fetal death reports in the previous season.  The data shows a 6.8 fetal loss per 1 million vaccinated in 2008/9; a massive spike to 77.8 fetal loss per 1 million vaccinated in 2009/10 Pandemic “double dose” season and a drop to 12.6 per million in 2010/2011 flu vaccine season.

 

One must also keep in mind that during the fear mongering that took place in order to “fast track” this untested H1N1 flu vaccine, the safety and effectiveness of the A H1N1 vaccine had neither been previously established in pregnant women nor had the combination of the two different strains of influenza vaccines ever been tested in pregnant women. In fact, while there were many different companies producing the Swine Flu vaccine, the vaccine package inserts for every one of them read: “It is not known whether these vaccines can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity”.

In a coincidental support of the Goldman study, a research paper was recently published in Toxicology & Environmental Chemistry authored by Ian A. Brown & David W. Austin (2012): Maternal transfer of mercury to the developing embryo/fetus: is there a safe level? (4). Using samples of fetal tissue exposed to mercury the data demonstrated “…that Hg (mercury) exposures, particularly during the first trimester of pregnancy, at well-established dose/weight ratios produced severe damage to humans including death”.

And what about the babies that survived the 2009/10 double-dose mercury in-utero influenza vaccines?

Brown/Austin comments: “In light of research suggestive of a mercuric risk factor for childhood conditions such as tic disorders, cerebral palsy, and autism, it is essential that Hg advisories account for secondary prenatal human exposures”.

Dr. Goldman comments: In addition, because of the order of magnitude increase in fetal-loss report rates, from 6.8 fetal-loss reports per million pregnant women vaccinated in the single-dose 2008/2009 season to 77.8 in the two-dose 2009/2010 season, further long-term studies are needed to assess adverse outcomes in the surviving children.

 

In conclusion:  Disregarding the aforementioned peer-reviewed studies, the CDC continues to aggressively recommend that pregnant women receive the flu vaccine (omitting that it contains high levels of toxic mercury).  Not only does the CDC continue to recommend that the emerging generation be injected in-utero with the flu vaccine that contains toxic ingredients such as aluminum and mercury but they also recommend that children receive the flu vaccine once again at 6 months, 7 months and every year thereafter (with mercury). Aside from the more than 39 vaccines injected into a child by the time he/she is six years old, in order to attend school, a child who lives to attain adulthood will have been injected with 20 doses of mercury having followed the CDC recommendations and mandates.  Dr. Bart Classen, a former NIH researcher has been quoted stating “We have not improved health.  We have changed the disease mix.  We have exchanged chronic illness for infectious disease”.

Having recently received some confidential material yet to be publicized concerning the NCOW independent investigation of the CDC/AJOG complicity in the ongoing “genocide of the unborn”, I can say, at this point, that there is evidence of willful misconduct and absolute criminality by these government agencies.

Who is taking the CDC to the mat on this?  The PREP Act passed by Congress in 2005 gave immunity to vaccine providers but not in the case of gross negligence or willful misconduct.  It is interesting to note that after the bill was drafted and approved by both the House and the Senate, providing these two exceptions to liability immunity, the HHS and the Attorney General, having the last word in translating legislation to law, apparently dropped “gross negligence” thereby changing a substantive part of the legislation.  Having bee privy to some of the confidential NCOW investigation, it seems to me that the collusion between the CDC and AJOG is beyond gross negligence and should still be prosecuted under this law!

For this reporter, I don’t know what could be more evil than the genocide of an entire emerging population and its cover up.

 

1)     Goldman: http://het.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/09/12/0960327112455067.abstract

2)     Moro: http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(10)01105-1/abstract

3)     Moro: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21861964

4)     Brown & Austin: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02772248.2012.724574

 

A note of thanks to the National Coalition of Organized Women and the Vaccine Liberation Army (www.VaccineLiberationArmy) for their ongoing work in exposing the genocide of the unborn.

 

Vax’d/Unvaxx’d Study Already Completed?

Curt Linderman Sr. Host of Linderman Unleashed on Natural News Radio

Research by: Joni Cox Host of Home Grown Health on Natural News Radio

March 23 2012

We in the Vaccine safety “anti-vaccine” communities (of which I am a proud member of the anti-vaccine crowd) have been calling for a vaccinated / unvaccinated study for decades now. We have talked to our Congress members, screamed the request from the rooftops and demanded action from the medical industrial complex that still declares the safety of the vaccine protocol with no data with which to back up their bold statements.

In preparation for my radio program and speaking with my producer, Joni Cox, she brought to my attention a bit of information that she had gleaned from some of her research.  The documents that we researched together and spoke about on the Friday (March 23rd) edition of Linderman Unleashed was a book written in 1902 by J.W. Hodge, M.D. entitled; The Vaccination Superstition. Hodge was joined in writing the book by other medical doctors of his era; Bernarr McFadden, Dr. Friedrich and Dr. M. R. Leverson.

McFadden goes on to say: “This belief (in vaccination) is not based on any particular theories of their own that they have deduced from personal experience, but has been secured from their medical colleges, or the physicians who preceded them in authority on the health board.” Just from that little tidbit in the first paragraphs of this amazing and eye opening publication, we ourselves can deduce that not much has changed in the past 100+ years.

Indeed, it seems that things are much worse today with the tyrannical nature of the powerful medical industrial complex than witnessed by the authors from the early nineteen hundreds. The Lancet of London actually had some scruples left within the editorial staff when on July 15th 1871, they state: “The deaths from smallpox have assumed proportions of a plague. Over 10,000 lives have been sacrificed during the past year in England and Wales. In London, 5,641 deaths have occurred since Christmas. Of the 9,392 patients in the London smallpox hospitals, no less than 6,854 had been vaccinated, i.e., nearly 73 per cent. Taking the mortality rate at 17 ½ per cent. Of those attacked, and the deaths this year in the whole country at 10,000, it will follow that more than 122,000 vaccinated persons have suffered from smallpox. This is an alarming state of things. Can we greatly wonder that the opponents of vaccination should point to such statistics as an evidence of the failure of the system? It is necessary to speak plainly on this matter.”

I think it is safe to say that if these individuals at the Lancet had been writing things like this today, they would find themselves before the General Medical Council of Great Britain alongside the likes of Wakefield, Walker Smith and Murch.

What is perhaps the most telling in this book however, is the case of the English town of Leicester. In 1889, Queen Victoria commissioned a group of “eight of the most distinguished medical men of England and quite a number of eminent men in other professions”, led by Prof. Alfred Russel Wallace, L.L.D.. F.R.S., to: “investigate the effect of vaccination.”

The town of Leicester had been hit extremely hard by small pox in 1872 at a point when the vaccination rate was very high. The doctors of Leicester had “so overdone the business of coercive vaccination, and public prosecution, that the public arose en masse in open revolt against the propagation of the vaccinator’s poison” and quickly became a town where vaccination was refused in such great numbers that the vaccination rate fell to 0.01% by the time the commission began studying the smallpox rates.

This is when Professor Wallace and his team of experts began to utilize their statistical expertise and decided to look at Leicester as an unvaccinated city and compare them with the English Army and Navy that were heavily vaccinated with repeated injections.  What they found was staggering and evidence of the first vax’d / unvax’d study is written down here in this publication for posterity.

“Professor Wallace produces official statements which verify his affirmation that, the town of Leicester is, and has been for more than twenty years, the least vaccinated town in the kingdom.”  The average population from 1873 to 1894 was about two-thirds of that of the army and navy of that period, yet the small pox deaths in the army and navy were 37 per million. Those of Leicester were well under 15 per million.

Wallace declares that “It is not possible to have a more complete and crucial test than this is, and it absolutely demonstrates the utter uselessness, or worse than uselessness, of re-vaccinating.” Armed with this information and obviously interested in further study of this anomaly, Wallace goes on to compare Leicester with other towns in Great Britain that are highly vaccinated. The town of Birmingham had more than 30 times the vaccination rate as Leicester with the following results:

1891 – 94

Per 10,000 population         Leicester          Birmingham

Smallpox cases                         19                          63

Smallpox deaths                       1                            5

 

Wallace states: “Here we see that Leicester had less than one-third the cases of smallpox and less than one-fourth the deaths in proportion to population than well vaccinated Birmingham; so that both the alleged protection from attacks of the disease and migration of its severity, when it does attack, are shown not only to be absolutely untrue, but to apply, in this case, to the absence of vaccination.”

There can be little doubt that what we see evidenced here is little different than what we are witnessing on a far grander scale with regards to the numerous vaccines that we deal with in today’s society. The cover-up continues, the need for a “new” vax’d / unvaxx’d study is even far more urgent and Washington D.C. , our elected officials and the medical industrial complex continues to ignore the very facts that were ignored over a century ago.

 

Link to: Linderman Unleashed interview with Joni Coxhttp://www.naturalnewsradio.com/LindermanUnleashed/MP3/LindermanUnleashed-2012-03-23-Joni-Cox.mp3

‘Legal’ Kidnapping By The State To Cover Up Vaccine Injuries

vaccine-child-abuse (1)

Author Christina England Courtesy of vactruth.com

In 1977 Professor Roy Meadow wrote a controversial paper on Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSBP) for the Lancet, entitled ‘The Hinterland of Child Abuse’ (1) The paper was deemed problematic by many because the second case study used as evidence of MSBP type abuse described a child presenting with excessive sodium (salt) in the blood. During Meadow’s discussion he disclosed that this child was force-fed 20 g of sodium, with difficulty, by himself and his colleagues. Sadly the child died!

Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSBP) is a fanciful diagnosis based on the fictional character Baron Munchausen. Baron Munchausen is said to have enjoyed a series of supposed travels and fantastical experiences with his band of misfits. It seems fitting that Meadow used this particular fictional storybook character to name this new syndrome.

This diagnosis is now being attached to parents and care givers to describe aspects of their behavior which usually includes subjecting what appears to be a previously healthy child to unnecessary and often painful tests or medical interventions i.e. scans, x-rays and even surgical procedures to gain what Meadow describes as attention from the medical profession.

THE VACCINE COVER UP BEGINS

I now believe that there is more to Meadow’s diagnosis than meets the eye. I say this because government papers have come to light proving that Meadow had ties to big pharma (2) and that he was attending government meetings discussing adverse reactions to vaccines from 1987-1991. In fact these documents prove that Meadow not only attended meetings on vaccinations but was advising committee members on the subjects of the yellow card reporting system, anaphylaxis, seizures and cot death and had even contributed to vaccination guidelines. (3) It was not long after these meetings that the largest vaccine cover up the world has ever seen began. Suddenly thousands of parents all over the world were accused of MSBP after their children had suffered a vaccine injury.

A make believe name had become a make believe disorder to enable professionals to pin the blame of vaccine induced injuries onto the shoulders of innocent parents.

One family caught up in the vaccine cover up was Mr. and Mrs. Peacher and their two children. Six years ago Mr. and Mrs. Peacher had their two children child A aged 6 and child B aged 7 snatched from them by social services after they claimed their children were vaccine injured.  Without warning the couple was falsely accused of MSBP and as a direct consequence of this accusation had both children taken away by social services (CPS). The children were then separated and put in foster families 200 km apart. All parental contact was severed in the case of child A and limited to just twice a year in the case of child B.

What grounds did social services have to snatch the children? Very little it appears as the children were reported to be appropriately dressed, well groomed and clean. According to the background reports to this case the children were well fed, cheerful and seemingly happy children.

The family did have problems however and there is no getting away from this. Mrs. Peacher was reported to suffer from bouts of poor mental health, suffering from stress, a mild personality disorder and mild learning difficulties. Mr. Peacher also is said to have mild learning difficulties and is reported to be manipulative at times.

The family had also moved around a lot and had been said to have had twelve different moves in eight years. According to Mr. Peacher this was because the children were being severely bullied for being ‘different’ and because of his work.

Did these problems amount to child abuse or were their children stolen because Mr. and Mrs. Peacher dared to suggest that they were vaccine damaged?

Reading through the reports the children did have problems mixing and had an array of ‘unmet needs’. The reports stated that the children both exhibited the following behaviors:

Poor attention spans, poor self control e.g. fidgeting, unsettled; presented as socially unboundaried e.g. over familiar, loud, ask inappropriate questions; struggling with poor peer relationships; invite or instigate aggression and bullying; and hit out and kick each other and their parents.

Child B has a confirmed learning difficulty and severe constipation leading to continual soiling throughout the day.

Child A has less learning difficulties than her brother although it is felt that she may plateau and then begin to struggle later on. She also has been reported to suffer from spina bifida, urinary tract infections and like Aaron suffers from severe constipation and incontinence.

WERE MR. AND MRS. PEACHER’S CHILDREN ABUSED OR DID THEY SUFFER FROM VACCINE INDUCED ILLNESS?

In 2000 Lisa Blakemore-Brown an independent applied psychologist, who specialized in ADHD, Asperger Syndrome and related disorders, wrote the book ‘Reweaving the Autistic Tapestry’.  Her research focused on early intensive system intervention, and the increasing professional recognition of the overlapping features of ADHD and Asperger Syndrome. Her book has had worldwide recognition and is a must have for any parents with children suffering from ADHD, Autism and related disorders.

In the chapter Blakemore-Brown entitled ‘Definitions, Descriptions and Disorders’ (4) she describes disorders that Mr. Peacher feels are very similar to those his children were reported to have been suffering from. After reading her book which describes disorders such as autism and ADHD he told me that it was like reading descriptions written about his own children. Strangely however, he informed me that neither of the two children had ever been formally assessed by an expert.

What is even stranger is that Mr. Peacher swears that his children’s problems only began after they received routine vaccinations. His description ties in with what Lisa Blakemore-Brown has been saying for 17 years. In fact it is her belief that it was her outspokenness that led to a ‘witch hunt’ orchestrated by the minions to drive her out.

In 2005 Daniel Foggo writing for the Telegraph (5) wrote;

A former government adviser who has controversially linked infant vaccines to autism in children claims she is the victim of a disciplinary action “witch-hunt”.

The child psychologist Lisa Blakemore-Brown believes that her outspokenness has made her enemies in the pharmaceutical business and in the Government.

Ms Blakemore-Brown, 57, has expounded the theory that diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis inoculations routinely given to babies at two months could be linked to autism and a range of allergies. She is facing disciplinary charges after being officially accused by the British Psychological Society of being potentially unfit to practice and of being paranoid.

Blakemore-Brown believes that thousands of parents worldwide lose their children when parents complain that their children’s autism/ADHD only began after routine vaccinations.

BLAKEMORE-BROWN IS NOT ALONE IN WHAT SHE BELIEVES

Blakemore-Brown is not alone in what she believes, another professional who believes that vaccines are causing vaccine induced illnesses including autism and ADHD and when parents complain they lose their children is Dr Rebecca Carley M.D. Carley has proved through a series of papers that autism is a non fatal version of SSPE (Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis). (6)

The myelin sheath is a fatty layer which insulates the nerves, just as does the plastic coating on an electrical cord. Demyelination is when the myelin breaks down causing interference with nerve conduction which leads to conditions like autism and ADHD. This was proven by scientists at UCLA. (8) What determines the resultant symptoms is the location and severity of the demyelination.

Carley documents that in the 10th edition of the book entitled Harrison’s Principals of Internal Medicine (9) it actually states that SSPE can be caused by the measles vaccination.

This is further evidenced by the fact that it has since been proven that professionals discussing the MMR vaccine during the ARVI meeting July 6th 1987 (10) (a meeting which Prof Meadow attended) actually referred to an SSPE like syndrome.

It is interesting that professionals were discussing SSPE in relation to the MMR vaccine especially as Dr Rebecca Carley M.D. has always firmly believed that SSPE is in fact non-fatal autism.

Dr Carley has documented that in the May 4, 2000 publication of the CDC (#99-6194) entitled “Vaccine Information Statements – What You Need to Know” on page 9 in the section “The Law (Recording Patient Information & Reporting Adverse Events) it states “A report under paragraph (1) regarding a vaccine shall include the time periods after the administration of such vaccine within which vaccine-related illnesses, disabilities, injuries, or…deaths occur, and the manufacturer and lot number of the vaccine.” The most important part of the scientific method is OBSERVATION; and observing you have a different child after a vaccine is administered has been transformed into a mental illness (MSBP) in the observer to cover up the epidemic of vaccine related disabilities and deaths.  This is FRAUD of the highest order, leading to the breakup of families like the Peachers which causes further psychological trauma to the children & the parents.

Once a whisper of MSBP has been whispered all professionals then see the parents as child abusers and cannot think outside the MSBP box. Blakemore-Brown describes this as putting on the Munchausen’s lenses, which she says are put on by the ‘duped professional’ looking at a case involving a parent who is suspected of suffering from MSBP. She says:

“Once wearing the lenses (influenced by the phenomena) the duped professional is blinded to the truth and can’t see what is staring him in the face and what his training has taught him”

Charles Pragnell Dip. S.W. L.R.C.C Consultant / Director an independent social care management consultant with over thirty years of experience in working directly with children and young people as a social worker and as a senior manager of social services is of the same opinion.

Pragnell is also worried about the sudden over use of the MSBP diagnosis. He speaks of his concerns in his paper entitled ‘MUNCHAUSEN SYNROME BY PROXY – A MYTHICAL MALADY!’ (12)

He says that not only were Meadow’s original findings of questionable validity, but as far as is known, MSBP was never subjected to any trial period under clinical and scientific conditions by any national medical body in the United Kingdom prior to its introduction as a medical diagnosis, nor has there been any trial period under clinical and scientific testing conditions to monitor and review its implementation.

In another paper which I believe to be one of the most important papers ever written on the subject of false accusations of child abuse (13) Pragnell states:

Many parents in many places around the world have given personal testimony that following the administration of vaccines to their child, the child has become seriously ill within hours or days. Such illnesses have taken many forms but commonly they are febrile, listless, and some are reported to have experienced epileptic seizures.

Within days or a few short weeks, parents report that their child then takes on a totally different personality – they are distant, unable to make eye contact, they are constantly restless and hyperactive – “they have gone into their own little world” is an often stated assessment by the parents. The parent, quite naturally, becomes extremely anxious and fraught as they lose contact with their child. They want their child to be healthy and normal, as the child was in the first few weeks after birth. So what has happened they wonder?.

In the Britain, the parent will usually seek help and advice from the Health Visitor and perhaps their General Practitioner but this is when they are hit with the first of the `Double Whammies’.

The Health Visitor reports them to the Child Protection agencies as their child is “failing to thrive” and is not reaching its expected developmental milestones. They are seen as over-anxious and if they seek a second medical opinion, they are accused of `Doctor-shopping’.

Dr Viera Scheibner Phd and retired research scientist agrees and states the following in her paper entitled ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome – The Vaccination Link’ (14) She writes:

While the term MSBP may have some validity in describing this special form of child abuse in the documented cases of parents slowly poisoning their child or exposing it to unnecessary and often dangerous and invasive medical treatments, more recently it became a way for some doctors to camouflage the real observed side-effects of especially measles (M), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and measles-rubella (MR) vaccinations in the UK. Many thousands of British children (up to 15,000 in my considered opinion) developed signs of autism usually associated with bowel symptoms after being given the above vaccines in 1994.

Surely this evidence given by some of the top professionals in the world studying this subject is proof that Mr. and Mrs. Peacher are not child abusers but actually inexperienced parents trying to cope with undiagnosed and therefore untreated severely vaccine damaged children. What they required more than six years ago was not blame and ridicule because they were parents with learning difficulties but help and guidance to enable them to stay the family that they so desperately wanted to be.

However, like a growing number of cases around the world instead of the help and guidance that Mr. and Mrs. Peacher so desperately needed they were blamed and punished in the worst way possible. They have had their family torn apart, their children sent to live 200 km away from each other losing not only each other but their loving, caring parents as well. Is this what the government calls child protection or is it really a clever and devious way for the government to protect their own lies and corruption under the guise of child protection?
Resources:

  1. Meadow ‘The Hinterland of Child Abuse’ http://www.msbp.com/hinterlands.htm
  2. FOI Request Reveals Major Vaccine Conspicacy http://vactruth.com/2012/01/03/foi-request-reveals-major-vaccine-conspiracy/
  3. How the Medical Profession Covered Up Vaccine Injuries and Called it ‘Child Abuse’ http://vactruth.com/2012/02/14/medical-cover-up-child-abuse/
  4. Reweaving the Autistic Tapestry by Lisa Blakemore-Brown Definitions, Descriptions and Disordershttp://books.google.co.uk/books?id=JdNyz05R9vsC&pg=PA153&lpg=PA153&dq=Lisa+Blakemore-Brown+ADHD+and+Autism+after+vaccination&source=bl&ots=HgXHOe9UXk&sig=vYnYkqs5ZhGO0YJWfbtw5ex7rKM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hKZDT9aXKsvQ8QOqzuGwCA&ved=0CF8Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q&f=false
  5. Daniel Foggo – I’m being driven out says second expert to link autism to and jabshttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1499684/Im-being-driven-out-says-second-expert-to-link-autism-and-jabs.html
  6. Dr Rebecca Carley http://www.drcarley.com/
  7. Blakemore-Brown – Therapist http://www.profitableharm.com/images/therapist%201.jpg
  8. Letter in the Psychologist on MSBP Lisa Blakemore-Brownhttp://www.profitableharm.com/psychologist_letter.html
  9. UCLA Breakdown in axon shields may spur autismhttp://www.fiercebiotechresearch.com/story/breakdown-in-axon-shields-may-spur-autism/2007-02-08
  10. HARRISON – PRINCIPALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINEhttp://www.drcarley.com/pdf/SSPE_from_Harrisons.jpg
  11. ARVI  6th July 1987 http://www.profitableharm.com/pdf/JOINT%20CSM-JCVI%20AND%20ARVI%206-7-87.pdf
  12. Charles Pragnell – Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy – A Mythical Malady! http://www.parents-protecting-children.org.uk/documents_show.asp?id=6
  13. Vaccines and Child Abuse by Charles Pragnell http://www.fassit.co.uk/vaccines_child_abuse.htm
  14. Shaken Baby Syndrome – The Vaccination Link Dr Viera Scheibnerhttp://www.whale.to/vaccines/sbs.html

False Flag Ops: It’s not Just for Bombs and Bullets anymore

avian flu

Curt Linderman Sr. Feb. 20 2012 Epidemic Citizen News

Recent news stories suggests that, despite safety and terrorism concerns, work on a deadly avian flu virus that has been bio engineered in two laboratories, will be released to the public. In a NYT article written by Denise Grady (1), it is stated that “The full details of recent experiments that made a deadly flu virus more contagious will be published, probably within a few months.” In articles discussing the bio ethics of releasing such information that could fall into the hands of “terrorists”, it has been stated that the United States of America has taken the lead in trying to stifle this information.

The new, more contagious avian flu virus (H5N1) was engineered by two separate scientists in two separate laboratories. A Dutch virologist, Ron Fouchier, developed his version of the deadly virus at Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam. A second scientist, Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the Universities of Wisconsin and Tokyo is said to have done similar work with similar results. Both have been rather blatant about the seeming ease with which this virus was engineered to become deadly to the human race.

The avian flu found in nature is only contagious to humans that have had direct contact with the infected birds. The reason for this is that the avian flu virus has smaller protein “spikes” that cause the immune response against the virus (2). These “spikes” are glycoproteins that line the lipid membrane of the virus. They are known as HA (Hemagglutinin) and NA (Neurominidase) and they determine the subtype of the influenza virus (H5N1 for example). The longer these “spikes” in the virus, the more contagious they are. There is little doubt to those that understand these viruses that elongating these spikes played a part in the bioengineering of the more virulent strain of the H5N1.

The problem that I seem to have with the United States government worrying about how dangerous this information could be and questioning why this work was performed in unprotected university labs as opposed to military installations is that this work was financed by the United States Government! In the United Kingdom’s Independent Newspaper, reporter Steve Conner reported (3); “A senior source close to the bio security board, who wished to remain anonymous, told the Independent that the National Institutes of Health, which funded the work, (emphasis added) is about to make a decision on how much of the scientific paper on the H5N1 super strain should be published, and how much held back.”

If one branch of the government funds such dangerous work (the NIH), how do other branches (National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity) react so stunningly when the scientists want to release this information and act dumbfounded that such work was carried out with so little security? This isn’t a common cold or case of Gonorrhea that we’re talking about here. This is a virus that has the potential to kill tens of millions, if not more.

Now many might wonder why this work was commissioned in the first place and even more so, why would they want to release this information? Dr. Fouchier states that this work will help develop vaccines. Vaccines however, are developed for certain viruses. If a bio engineered virus never existed, why would a vaccine for that virus be needed?

This has happened before, despite the fact that you don’t hear about it in the main stream media. Baxter Pharmaceuticals of Illinois released the deadly H5N1 virus in flu vaccines destined for 18 different countries (4). Czech scientists discovered the problem when they pre-tested the vaccine lots on ferrets prior to dispensing the drug to its citizens. Ferrets are used to test flu vaccines and viruses because they have similar immune responses to humans. The ferrets all died and when the vaccine was tested, it was discovered that the vaccines contained the H5N1 avian flu virus.

When introduced with the flu virus that is contagious to humans, there was a very distinct probability that the avian virus could have easily mutated and become more infectious to humans. Dr. Fouchier stated: “”We have discovered that this is indeed possible, and more easily than previously thought. In the laboratory, it was possible to change H5N1 into an aerosol-transmissible virus that can easily be spread through the air; this process could also take place in a natural setting.” (5)

Baxter suggested that this had been an “accident”. How an avian flu virus gets accidently mixed into a flu vaccine destined for the public in a BSL3 (Biosafety Level 3) lab is beyond comprehension. They shouldn’t even have been in the same room. One is a potential deadly bioweapon and the other is a supposedly therapeutic weapon against the flu virus. One must consider, is this new bioengineered avian flu virus simply another means to the same end?

The Oklahoma City bombing and 9-11 were blamed on terrorists but had the desired effect on the American People (i.e passage of the Anti-Terrorism Act and going to war respectively). If this deadly virus were to become a pandemic, it would be blamed on terrorists who took advantage of the poor security and the poor ethics of a small number of scientists. Meanwhile, few people will know about the government funding of such a foolhardy and dangerous experiment. Terrorists will be targeted, undoubtedly in some third world nation with some natural resource or drug desired by the elites of this world.

There is little doubt that the elites are getting very nervous. More and more people are becoming aware of their agenda. Will a staged war be enough to silence the populace this time? Or will it take something far smaller than a bomb or some other weapon of mass destruction to stop the educated masses from winning this war for our very freedom?

(1)   http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/18/health/details-of-bird-flu-research-will-be-released.html

(2)   http://www.virology.ws/2009/04/30/structure-of-influenza-virus/

(3)   http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/alarm-as-dutch-lab-creates-highly-contagious-killer-flu-6279474.html#

(4)   http://www.naturalnews.com/025760.html

(5)   http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/alarm-as-dutch-lab-creates-highly-contagious-killer-flu-6279474.html#

CDC Manipulated and Covered up Scientific Data Showing link Between Vaccines Containing Mercury and Autism

question authority

This story is courtesy of: World Truth TV

Deniers of the link between mercury-laden vaccines and autism are going to have a hard time denying the latest findings by the Coalition for Mercury-Free Drugs (CoMeD). The nonprofit group has obtained critical documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that exposes the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) role in deliberately lying about and manipulating a key Danish study that showed a clear link between vaccines containing mercury and autism.